This is our second update on the litigation (you can see the prior analyses here and here, in addition to a parallel post on our companion...
Litigation Spotlight
-
http://twitter.com/share?text="[TITLE]&url=[PERMALINK]
-
By Spencer Johnson Comments are off
Since our prior article on the litigation between Amgen and Hospira over Hospira’s proposed biosimilar to Amgen’s Epogen®, there have...
http://twitter.com/share?text="[TITLE]&url=[PERMALINK]ShareEmail, Linked In, Twitter, Facebook, Google Plus
-
By Daniel McCallum Comments are off
This article provides an update on our prior analysis of the infliximab litigation involving Janssen Biotech, Inc. (“Janssen”),...
http://twitter.com/share?text="[TITLE]&url=[PERMALINK]ShareEmail, Linked In, Twitter, Facebook, Google Plus
-
Posted in:
Litigation Spotlight: The Apotex Filgrastim (Neupogen®) and Pegfilgrastim (Neulasta®) Litigation
By Rachel M. Echols Comments are off
Introduction and Background The Apotex filgrastim/pegfilgrastim biosimilar litigation was the first biosimilar litigation where the...
Tagged with: Amgen, Amgen v. Apotex, Apotex, BPCIA, District Court, Featured, Federal Circuit, filgrastim, Legal, Litigation, Litigation Spotlight, Neulasta®, Neupogen®, Notice, Notice Requirement, Patent Dance, pegfilgrastim
http://twitter.com/share?text="[TITLE]&url=[PERMALINK]ShareEmail, Linked In, Twitter, Facebook, Google Plus
-
By Daniel McCallum Comments are off
Editors’ Note: Although the BPCIA was enacted seven years ago, to date, only four biosimilar products have been approved by the FDA, and...
http://twitter.com/share?text="[TITLE]&url=[PERMALINK]ShareEmail, Linked In, Twitter, Facebook, Google Plus