Menu

Rothwell Figg BiosimilarIP Blog

Skip navigation Menu
  • Regulatory
  • Legal
  • News
  • About RFEM
  • Search

BPCIA

Random entry RSS

You are here:

  1. Home
  2. Tag Archives: BPCIA
  • Posted in:

    • Regulatory

    New Report Says Biosimilars Could Save $54 Billion in Biologics Spending

    By D. Lawson Allen November 7, 2017 Comments are off

    According to a new report by RAND Corporation, biosimilars could save $54 billion in healthcare spending on biologics over the next ten...

    Read more

    Tagged with: Biologics, BPCIA, Medicare, Regulatory

    http://twitter.com/share?text="[TITLE]&url=[PERMALINK]

    ShareEmail, Linked In, Twitter, Facebook, Google Plus

  • Posted in:

    • Regulatory

    Update: How the U.S. Compares to Europe on Biosimilar Approvals and Products In the Pipeline

    By Andrew Storaska and Aydin Harston September 7, 2017 Comments are off

    European Medicines Agency newly approves five rituximab biosimilars and an etanercept biosimilar, while recommending approval of...

    Read more

    Tagged with: BPCIA, EMA, FDA, Regulatory

    http://twitter.com/share?text="[TITLE]&url=[PERMALINK]

    ShareEmail, Linked In, Twitter, Facebook, Google Plus

  • Posted in:

    • Legal

    AbbVie Files BPCIA Suit Against Boehringer Ingelheim Over Humira® (Adalimumab)

    By C. Nichole Gifford August 15, 2017 Comments are off

    Recently, AbbVie, Inc. and AbbVie Biotechnology, LTD (collectively “AbbVie” or “Plaintiffs”) filed a Complaint in the United States...

    Read more

    Tagged with: AbbVie, adalimumab, Boehringer Ingelheim, BPCIA, District Court, Humira®, Legal, Litigation, Patent Dance

    http://twitter.com/share?text="[TITLE]&url=[PERMALINK]

    ShareEmail, Linked In, Twitter, Facebook, Google Plus

  • Posted in:

    • News

    FDA Reauthorization Bill is Enacted–Changes Biosimilar User Fees and Review Model

    By Aydin Harston August 4, 2017 Comments are off

    The U.S. Senate passed S.934 – FDA Reauthorization Act of 2017 on Thursday, August 3, 2017, by a 94-1 vote after having been passed by...

    Read more

    Tagged with: BPCIA, BSUFA II, FDA, Guidance, Regulatory

    http://twitter.com/share?text="[TITLE]&url=[PERMALINK]

    ShareEmail, Linked In, Twitter, Facebook, Google Plus

  • Posted in:

    • Legal

    Litigation Spotlight Update: The Epoetin alfa (Epogen®) Litigation

    By Spencer Johnson August 2, 2017 Comments are off

    Since our prior article on the litigation between Amgen and Hospira over Hospira’s proposed biosimilar to Amgen’s Epogen®, there have...

    Read more

    Tagged with: Amgen, Amgen v. Hospira, BPCIA, District Court, epoetin alfa, Epogen®, Erythropoietin, Featured, Federal Circuit, Hospira, Janssen, Legal, Litigation, Litigation Spotlight, Notice Requirement, Patent Dance, Pfizer, Procrit®, Retacrit®, Supreme Court

    http://twitter.com/share?text="[TITLE]&url=[PERMALINK]

    ShareEmail, Linked In, Twitter, Facebook, Google Plus

  • Posted in:

    • Legal

    The Supreme Court’s Decision in Amgen v. Sandoz: Clear Guidance and Open Questions for Biosimilars

    By Jennifer P. Nock July 21, 2017 Comments are off

    As we previously reported here, earlier this year the Supreme Court agreed to hear its first case arising under the Biosimilars Price...

    Read more

    Tagged with: Amgen v. Sandoz, BPCIA, Legal, Litigation, Notice Requirement, Patent Dance, Sandoz v. Amgen, Supreme Court

    http://twitter.com/share?text="[TITLE]&url=[PERMALINK]

    ShareEmail, Linked In, Twitter, Facebook, Google Plus

  • Posted in:

    • News

    Update: BsUFA II Clears the House and Awaits Senate Vote

    By Aydin Harston and Andrew Storaska July 14, 2017 Comments are off

    H.R.2430 – FDA Reauthorization Act of 2017, a bill reauthorizing all of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) user fee...

    Read more

    Tagged with: BPCIA, BSUFA II, FDA, Guidance, Regulatory

    http://twitter.com/share?text="[TITLE]&url=[PERMALINK]

    ShareEmail, Linked In, Twitter, Facebook, Google Plus

  • Posted in:

    • Legal

    How Will TC Heartland Impact BPCIA and Hatch-Waxman Litigation?

    By Nicole DeAbrantes July 6, 2017 Comments are off

    The patent venue statue, 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b), states that “ny civil action for patent infringement may be brought in the judicial...

    Read more

    Tagged with: BPCIA, District Court, Federal Court, Legal, Litigation, News, Supreme Court, Venue

    http://twitter.com/share?text="[TITLE]&url=[PERMALINK]

    ShareEmail, Linked In, Twitter, Facebook, Google Plus

  • Posted in:

    • Regulatory

    An Overview of Important Changes in BsUFA II

    By Aydin Harston June 27, 2017 Comments are off

    The Biosimilar User Fee Act (“BsUFA”) was originally enacted in 2012, and the current legislative authority is set to expire at the end...

    Read more

    Tagged with: BPCIA, BSUFA II, FDA, Guidance, Regulatory

    http://twitter.com/share?text="[TITLE]&url=[PERMALINK]

    ShareEmail, Linked In, Twitter, Facebook, Google Plus

Pages

  • Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • Next

Sign Up for Updates

Don’t worry. We don’t spam.

Practice Contacts

  • E. Anthony Figg

  • Joseph A. Hynds

  • Seth Cockrum

Featured Posts

  • U.S. – E.U. Mutual Recognition Agreement Will Reduce Costs

    August 1, 2019

  • House Democrats Seek to Remove Biologics Exclusivity Period From USMCA

    July 25, 2019

  • What Pharma Companies Must Do Globally to Benefit From Canada’s Patent Term Extension Framework

    July 22, 2019

Popular Tags

AbbVie adalimumab Amgen Avastin® bevacizumab Biocon Biogen Boehringer Ingelheim BPCIA Celltrion District Court EMA FDA Featured Federal Circuit Genentech Herceptin® Hospira Humira® Infliximab IPR Janssen Legal Litigation Mylan Neulasta® News Notice Requirement Patent Dance pegfilgrastim Pfizer PTAB Regeneron Regulatory Remicade® Rituxan® Rituximab Roche Samsung Bioepsis Sandoz Sanofi Supreme Court Teva trastuzumab USPTO
Opinions expressed in articles on www.BiosimilarsIP.com are solely those of the author only and do not necessarily reflect the views of Rothwell Figg Ernst & Manbeck, P.C., its clients, or any of its respective affiliates. These materials are for general information purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice per the full disclaimer below.

Contact Us

Email Us
202.783.6040
Our Location

Find Out More

  • About Us
  • Results
  • Careers
  • Practices
  • Publications
  • News & Events
  • Professionals

© 2019 Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C. All Rights Reserved

  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
Back to Top