
This is our second update on the litigation (you can see the prior analyses here and here, in addition to a parallel post on our companion...
To learn about Mr. McCallum's practice, please visit http://www.rfem.com/professionals/mccallumd.
This is our second update on the litigation (you can see the prior analyses here and here, in addition to a parallel post on our companion...
Tagged with: Celltrion, Featured, Hospira, Infliximab, Janssen, Legal, Litigation Spotlight, Remicade®
Several of the Federal Circuit’s initial decisions involving the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (the “BPCIA”) focused...
Tagged with: Amgen, Amgen v. Apotex, Apotex, BPCIA, District Court, Federal Circuit, Legal, Litigation, Patent Dance
This article provides an update on our prior analysis of the infliximab litigation involving Janssen Biotech, Inc. (“Janssen”),...
By C. Nichole Gifford and Daniel McCallum
Genentech filed suit against Amgen this past February when a dispute arose between the parties during the first step of the “patent...
Tagged with: Amgen, Avastin®, bevacizumab, BPCIA, District Court, Genentech, Genentech v. Amgen, Legal, Litigation, Patent Dance
Editors’ Note: Although the BPCIA was enacted seven years ago, to date, only four biosimilar products have been approved by the FDA, and...
By Daniel McCallum and C. Nichole Gifford
Genentech’s lawsuit against Amgen has come to a quick (although perhaps temporary) end, with the Court dismissing Genentech’s complaint...
Tagged with: Amgen, Avastin®, bevacizumab, BPCIA, District Court, Genentech, Genentech v. Amgen, Legal, Litigation, Patent Dance